2

Three candidates deserve a closer look

Nick Grabbe

An ideal Town Council would include a healthy mix of new faces and old hands. Newcomers to town government bring fresh ideas and perspectives, while councilors with experience provide institutional memory and awareness of how things work.

I’m impressed that capable newcomers such as Shalini Bahl-Milne, Evan Ross, Darcy DuMont and Pat DeAngelis did so well in the preliminary election Sept. 4.

But I’m concerned that the qualifications of three candidates who didn’t do as well haven’t gotten enough attention. These three candidates possess valuable knowledge of  planning, zoning and finance, and this knowledge would provide solid foundations for many of the decisions the Town Council will make.

Voters will make up their own minds among the 26 candidates for Town Council. But I think we should be skeptical of anyone who says that prior experience in town government doesn’t matter, or who panders to residents’ aversion to change, or offers simplistic solutions to complex problems. Isn’t that how we got our current President?

Steve Schreiber is a candidate in District 4 (Precincts 5 and 9). He’s been a Planning Board member for over nine years and chair for the last two.

So he’s been a visible target for people who don’t like the two new downtown buildings. I believe this criticism is unjust. The height and appearance of the two buildings were largely outside the board’s control, and Schreiber believes it would be a good idea to slow down development in that part of downtown. Like many people, he thinks 1 East Pleasant is too close to the street for a building that size, but its setback from the street didn’t require a waiver.

Schreiber is well versed in the Zoning Bylaw, the thick book of rules dictating what kinds of development are permissible where, and with what levels of review. It will require a two-thirds vote on the Town Council to change any of these rules. Both supporters and opponents of any changes would benefit from Schreiber’s awareness of what the Zoning Bylaw says and how it’s applied.

He is an architect and a UMass professor, and he’s engaged his students in a project to design alternative development plans at the Bertucci’s/Pray Street site. At the other proposed downtown development, on Spring Street, the Planning Board has been criticized for not requiring parking. But the board didn’t have that power.

Schreiber would be a bridge-builder on the Town Council, not a building-booster. I’ve been impressed by his willingness to reach out and listen to people who are critical of the new downtown buildings (even those who can’t vote for him), and explain his position.

He got involved in town politics 10 years ago in the campaign to keep an Amtrak station in Amherst. He has been a Town Meeting member for seven years and has served on the Agriculture Committee. His knowledge would be useful on the Town Council.

Paul Bobrowski is a candidate in District 5 (Precincts 7 and 8). His experience in town government is broad: he’s served on the Planning Board, Finance Committee, Town Meeting, Housing Authority and Cable Advisory Committee, and been a delegate to the Hampshire Council of Governments. He’s a lawyer with expertise in land use.

His main rival, Darcy DuMont, has done admirable work to combat climate change but has no experience in town government. Bobrowski also believes in the importance of climate change. He supports zero-energy buildings and solar arrays on private property, and has installed solar panels on his own house.

As a member of the Planning Board, he supported affordable housing, farmland preservation and recreational fields. He has in-depth knowledge of zoning, construction, parking, and the need to broaden our tax base.

Bobrowski, who lives on Hulst Road, has personal awareness of the need for a fire station in the southernmost part of Amherst. The response time for ambulances traveling to this corner of town has not been fast enough, and Bobrowski wants to work on a solution to this long-standing problem.

In the preliminary election, Schreiber and Bobrowski both came in third in their districts. To be elected on Nov. 6, they must get more votes than female rivals with less experience who came in second. For those keeping score, even if Schreiber and Bobrowski are both elected, it’s probable that a majority of the Town Council members will be women.

As a Select Board member since 2014, Andy Steinberg has been negotiating with Leverett and Shutesbury officials over the complex formula for apportioning the cost of the regional schools. This is a delicate question whose answer will have a big impact on Amherst’s budget, and Steinberg would provide continuity in the talks if he’s elected to the Town Council.

But there are four strong candidates for three at-large seats, and he came in fourth in the preliminary election.

Steinberg is retired after 26 years as executive director of Western Mass. Legal Services. He knows as much about municipal finance as any Amherst resident, having served on the Finance Committee for nine years, three of them as chair. He has served on Town Meeting, the Budget Coordinating Group, and the Joint Capital Planning Committee.

He’s well acquainted with another potential school budget crisis, the precarious state of the Fort River roof. He’s looked at all the options, none of which are attractive. He also worked with former Town Manager John Musante and former Finance Director Sandy Pooler on plans for paying for four major infrastructure projects. His knowledge of these issues would be beneficial to the Town Council.

I’m not saying that you should automatically vote for these three candidates. But I think voters should be aware of the loss of expertise on these complex issues if they do not become members of the Town Council.

 

Comments 2

  1. Well said. I think it will be vital to have some councilors with deep experience in the complex areas of finance and planning to reduce the likelihood of consequential mistakes.

  2. The Select Board set up the Save-our-Stop Task Force in 2009 (after considerable prompting by yours truly). It was a pleasure to work with David Ahlfeld, Rob Crowner, Tony Maroulis, Lad Nagurney, Paule Peele, and Steve Schreiber

    https://www.amherstma.gov/1216/Save-Our-Stop-SOS-Task-Force

    in an effort to not only “save” but significantly improve passenger rail service in Amherst.

    One idea is to establish a new north-south rail shuttle service on the line between Northfield, Amherst, and the Palmer junction. Such a shuttle could connect with new or existing (the once-a-day-each-way AMTRAK Lakeshore Limited between Boston-Springfield-Albany-…-Chicago) passenger service on the main east-west CSX freight line (between Boston, Worcester, and Springfield), and possibly extend south to serve the University of Connecticut or even New London (through which the AMTRAK Northeast Corridor runs along the coast).

    When north-south AMTRAK service moved back to the other side of the Connecticut River, the Amherst line reverted to freight use only. Fortunately this track was recently improved to continuous-welded-rail, allowing much smoother, safer travel at considerably higher speeds, possibly as high as 130kmh (79mph), reducing the time from here to the east-west train line in Palmer to under 25 minutes. (Unfortunately, several at-grade crossings may compromise the maximal design speed.)

    MassDoT continues studying possible future improvements to east-west passenger service between Worcester and Springfield. The most promising options are running more “inland-route” AMTRAK trips (in addition to the Lakeshore Limited), or extending MBTA commuter service west of Worcester. But there are significant freight priority issues and other challenges to overcome on the narrow, bendy right-of-way between Worcester and Palmer.

    There have been many public forums on this issue over the past decade (the most recent was one I participated in with Eric Lesser, John Olver, Stan Rosenberg and others, at the PVPC headquarters in Springfield last winter), but far too few voices from Amherst speaking up about reconnecting Amherst with the rest of the region via environmentally-friendly, energy-efficient passenger rail.

    The SOS Task Force may be history, but this remains an important long-range project, so it would be great to see “all hands on deck” – it’s something that we should continue to advocate for and work on!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *